Blind peer reviewers will receive by March 15 approximately three to five 500-750 word proposals to review. Blind peer reviewers complete their review online with numerical feedback as well as comments by April 2.  This is our most rigorous review, and it is held to the highest standards of the field. Not all blind peer review submissions will be approved.   We will announce the approval rate for use in review materials. Proposals not approved will be automatically routed to the conference co-chairs for regular review.  Blind Peer review proposals that are accepted receive special recognition in the conference program.

Mentors will receive by March 15 about three to five 500-750 word proposals to review. Mentors contact their mentee with supportive and constructive feedback.  As a result of this friendly feedback, mentees can update their submission by the April 26 final deadline. Mentors will submit online comment to the conference co-chairs by April 2.   

Click here to be a blind peer reviewer and/or peer mentor.

Mentor/Blind Peer Review Proposals Due:  March 1
Workshop Proposals Due: March 1
Assignments Made to Blind Peer Reviewer and Mentors: by March 15
Blind Peer Review and Mentor Comment Due: April 2
Final Proposals and Revised Mentored Proposals Due: April 26